I built a system that verifies if security decisions were tampered with (offline)

I built a system that verifies whether a security decision was altered or not. The idea is simple: given a decision file and its evidence bundle, the system can independently verify its integrity. It produces: VERIFIED (intact) or TAMPERED (modified) Key characteristics: works fully offline (no cloud, no API) deterministic (same input always gives the same result) no need to trust the original system Why this matters: teams can run security scans, but often cannot prove why a decision was made after the fact. This focuses only on verification and proof. I created a simple demo: run verify modify one value see it fail I’m interested to know: would something like this be useful in audits, compliance, or incident investigations? If relevant, feel free to reach out: [email protected]